This page requires JavaScript to display.

Voter database injunction

News · Heat 2.2 / 10 · 2 shows · 17m airtime

On October 24, Judge Araceli Martinez Alguyen entered a preliminary injunction barring DHS and DOJ from using a voter eligibility database for election-related field investigations and arrests in nine states before the election. The order found the surge violates Section 11(b) of the Voting Rights Act and causes irreparable harm. Reporting has since detailed the database's composition, pairing 48.2 million records from questionable independent sources with 50.6 million from state rolls or unreliable commercial versions, enriched through iLab, and a thumb drive of 20,000 flagged voters given to California. DOJ has not ruled out weighing in on state certification.

How 2 podcasts covered it

  1. Legal AF by MeidasTouch, 2026-10-24 (0:00 to 4:08)
    Breaks down the database's record counts
    Reads the injunction closely, walking through the judge's findings on the database: 48.2 million records from questionable independent sources, 50.6 million from state rolls or unreliable commercial versions, all enriched through iLab with unknown AI tools. It quotes the operative order enjoining election-related field operations in the nine states.
    New angle: The database pairs 48.2 million records from questionable independent sources with 50.6 million from state rolls or unreliable commercial versions, enriched through iLab.
  2. Legal AF by MeidasTouch, 2026-10-24 (4:16 to 5:20)
    Plays Blanche declining to rule out involvement
    Plays a clip of Todd Blanche declining to rule out DOJ involvement in state certification, saying only that it is not the department's intention to interfere improperly. A new on-the-record statement from a party, tied back to the database fight.
    New angle: Todd Blanche would not rule out DOJ weighing in on state election certification.
  3. Legal AF by MeidasTouch, 2026-10-24 (5:20 to 8:48)
    Presses on the 20,000 flagged California voters
    Pulls a thread the injunction coverage left loose: a thumb drive of 20,000 California voters DHS and DOJ flagged as likely non-citizens, and presses on what 'likely' means. Frames it as the first state where the list was taken on the road.
    New angle: DHS and DOJ handed California a thumb drive of 20,000 voters flagged as likely non-citizens.
  4. Legal AF by MeidasTouch, 2026-10-24 (8:48 to 10:36)
    Reads the injunction's Voting Rights Act findings
    Reads the injunction's findings on pages 11 and 15: the surge violates Section 11(b) of the Voting Rights Act, and voters improperly dissuaded cannot be identified or have their votes recast, so money damages would not suffice.
    New angle: The judge found the surge violates Section 11(b) of the Voting Rights Act and causes irreparable harm.
  5. Legal AF by MeidasTouch, 2026-10-24 (10:36 to 12:26)
    Previews the appellate ruling on the stay
    Recaps the voter database injunction and the 5 p.m. stay deadline, then predicts Trump will fail to get relief from the D.C. federal appellate court. It stays inside the order's terms and previews a HuffPost interview.
  6. Pod Save America, 2026-10-25 (14:16 to 18:34)
    Recaps the injunction and urges official drop boxes
    Recaps the Unlawful Voter Initiative and the judge's order limiting DHS agents, then moves to practical advice: Holder says the announcement itself chills voting in mixed-status households and urges dropping ballots at official locations, citing North Carolina's inner-envelope rule.
Unpacking...