This page requires JavaScript to display.

You Can See Everything

True crime · Heat 5.2 / 10 · 5 shows · 2h 2m airtime

The trailer for You Can See Everything, a Fielder and Oppenheim documentary on Elizabeth Holmes, was released in late September 2026, ahead of her surrender to FPC Bryan in Texas. Reporting since has established that Fielder secretly filmed Holmes, her partner Billy Evans and their two children for a month before prison, and that Evans's father posed as an observer named Hanson at jury selection before appearing with the family on the trial's first day. Trial texts show Holmes enjoyed the spotlight and premeditated coverage, contradicting her on-camera claim that her entourage pushed her into it. Holmes and Evans first approached A24 about documenting their lives; Fielder called A24 months later. The film's second half picks up about two years…

How 5 podcasts covered it

  1. Hard Fork, 2026-10-16 (0:27 to 2:52)
    Sets up the panel around the new documentary
    Opens the episode by setting up the panel around the new Fielder and Oppenheim documentary, noting the secret month of filming with Holmes and her family before her prison term and the trailer's late-September release.
    New angle: Fielder secretly spent a month filming Holmes, her partner and their two children before her prison term.
  2. Hard Fork, 2026-10-16 (10:17 to 11:22)
    Adds the father posing as an observer
    Adds a pre-trial detail from the reporting: Billy Evans's father sat through jury selection under the name Hanson, telling reporters he was an observer interested in criminal justice, then turned up arm-in-arm with Holmes's family on day one of trial.
    New angle: Billy Evans's father posed as an observer named Hanson at jury selection, then appeared with Holmes's family on the trial's first day.
  3. Hard Fork, 2026-10-16 (11:30 to 14:09)
    Adds Fielder's email and the harassment suspicion
    Carreyrou tells the panel Fielder emailed him about 18 months before the episode, while he was being harassed by someone, and that he suspected Fielder was working with that person; he forwarded the email to his agents, who contacted Fielder's agent. The rest is trailer reaction and a read of Holmes's performance.
    New angle: Fielder emailed Carreyrou about 18 months before the episode; Carreyrou suspected he was tied to a harasser.
  4. Hard Fork, 2026-10-16 (15:15 to 19:19)
    Adds the declined interview requests
    Carreyrou and Roper compare the documentary's Holmes with the Holmes they encountered, and Carreyrou puts on the record that he asked her for an interview twice, in late 2015 and early 2016, and was declined both times.
    New angle: Carreyrou asked Holmes for an interview in late 2015 and early 2016 and was declined both times.
  5. Hard Fork, 2026-10-16 (19:19 to 22:45)
    Reads Holmes's wardrobe against the trial texts
    Reads Holmes's wardrobe in the film against the turtleneck era and lands on the photography-studio scene, where she cries and blames her entourage for pushing her into the spotlight; Carreyrou calls it a brazen lie and points to trial texts showing she sought the coverage.
    New angle: Trial texts show Holmes enjoyed the spotlight and premeditated coverage, contradicting her on-camera claim that her entourage pushed her into it.
  6. Uncanny Valley | WIRED, 2026-10-19 (1:12 to 7:13)
    Walks through the 34-day opening
    Drummond recounts the NDA-gated cover booking and her Telluride screening, then walks through the film's 34-day Fielder-Holmes-Evans opening and her late-September interview, closing on the suspicious 12:15 Sunday Zoom.
    New angle: You Can See Everything opens on a 34-day psychological exchange between Fielder, Elizabeth Holmes and Billy Evans before her incarceration.
  7. Uncanny Valley | WIRED, 2026-10-19 (7:13 to 16:43)
    Explains the three-year secrecy around the film
    Fielder, in the interview, explains the three-year secrecy: the subjects' concerns, paparazzi circling the shoot, and A24 not knowing the film was being made. He says Holmes and Evans first approached A24 themselves, and that he asked A24 for the freedom to deliver nothing.
    New angle: Holmes and Evans first approached A24 about documenting their lives; Fielder called A24 months later asking to meet her.
  8. Uncanny Valley | WIRED, 2026-10-19 (18:31 to 25:56)
    Details the camera rig in the beach house
    Fielder details the camera rig inside Holmes and Evans' beach house - a 12mm wide and two 25-250mm zooms, three operators - and says Holmes never once asked the crew to leave during her final month before prison. Drummond's empathy for Holmes shifts after re-reading the record.
    New angle: Holmes never asked the crew to stop filming or leave during her final month before prison.
  9. Uncanny Valley | WIRED, 2026-10-19 (25:56 to 34:46)
    Describes Fielder's first meeting with Holmes
    Fielder, on the record, describes his first meeting with Holmes: he expected outward anxiety and a need to control, and found neither, which unsettled him. He says the crew's clashing daily readings became the film's premise.
    New angle: Fielder says Holmes let the crew into the beach house without asking their angle, which he found jarring.
  10. Uncanny Valley | WIRED, 2026-10-19 (36:31 to 44:56)
    Recounts Fielder cutting off Evans
    Fielder's account of the end of production: he says Billy Evans tried harder to control the project as it was being finished, that communication was cut off, and that Evans has not seen the film. He also says Holmes did not seem to believe she was going to prison until very close to the date.
    New angle: Fielder cut off communication with Billy Evans near the end of production; Evans has not seen the film.
  11. Law&Crime Sidebar, 2026-10-19 (0:00 to 2:09)
    Frames the film as the closest thing to testimony
    Opens the episode with a spoiler-warned framing of You Can See Everything, noting Fielder co-directed and stars and that Holmes's federal trial had no cameras, so the film is the closest thing to hearing her testify. Setup, not new reporting.
  12. Law&Crime Sidebar, 2026-10-19 (2:09 to 6:06)
    Recaps the Theranos backstory before the film
    Recaps the Theranos backstory ahead of the documentary: the finger-stick claim, the 2015 Wall Street Journal expose, the 2018 SEC charges, the indictment, the four-month trial and the split verdict. It stays inside the established record, adding only the sentencing figure of 11 years.
  13. Law&Crime Sidebar, 2026-10-19 (6:11 to 8:09)
    Walks through the film's two-part structure
    Walks through the film's two-part structure: the Del Mar rental with Evans and the children in the 34 days before surrender to FPC Bryan, then a jump of about two years to Holmes in prison. Adds the surrender facility and the press-packet line from Fielder.
    New angle: Holmes surrendered to FPC Bryan in Texas; the film's second half picks up about two years later.
  14. Law&Crime Sidebar, 2026-10-19 (8:09 to 11:25)
    Walks through the garage scene denial
    Walks through the film's garage scene: Holmes says she never lied and stands by the blood device, then fails the Who's on First test. Weber reads it as a retelling of the documentary's central denial, not new reporting.
  15. Law&Crime Sidebar, 2026-10-19 (11:27 to 15:07)
    Walks through the film's new venture reveals
    Walks through the film's reveals: Holmes and Evans are starting a new healthcare venture she calls inventing from a cage, the title comes from her text to Fielder, and her appeal arguments surface on camera. Weber notes the appeal has reportedly been denied.
    New angle: The film shows Holmes and Evans starting a new healthcare startup, referenced as Theranos 2.0.
  16. Murder Sheet, 2026-10-20 (31:00 to 34:21)
    Walks through the access and the sympathy it builds
    Walks through the first half's access and the sympathy it produces: Holmes caring for her two young children in the month before prison. It stays inside the access and humanizing angle already on the record, adding reaction rather than a new development.
  17. Murder Sheet, 2026-10-20 (34:53 to 38:43)
    Analyzes Fielder's interview technique and her tears
    Analyzes Fielder's interview technique, his use of silence and repeated follow-ups, and reads Holmes's crying as either sincerity or a tactic to stall. Stays inside the film's scenes already on the record.
  18. Murder Sheet, 2026-10-20 (38:34 to 44:25)
    Walks through the Who's on First scene
    Walks through the Who's on First scene at length: Holmes laughs politely, cannot explain the joke, and Evans says it shows she sees things differently. The hosts debate whether that is quirk or deflection, but the facts stay inside what the film already shows.
  19. Murder Sheet, 2026-10-20 (44:36 to 51:12)
    Debates whether the film's portrait is manipulation
    Debates whether the film's quirky-misunderstood portrait is a manipulation tactic borrowed from wrongful conviction narratives. Anya reads Holmes as a skilled manipulator relitigating her convictions; Kevin feels sympathy for her as a mother but still sees entitlement and fraud. Stays inside the film's framing.
  20. Murder Sheet, 2026-10-20 (51:12 to 54:40)
    Recaps the film's open-ended portrait of Holmes
    Recaps the film's open-ended portrait of Holmes and the new company she and Evans are trying to launch, framing it as a question of whether she has learned anything. Stays inside the ground already covered and teases the second half for a later episode.
  21. Pablo Torre Finds Out, 2026-10-22 (9:02 to 15:09)
    Lays out the film's 34-day countdown
    Pablo and Wesley Morris lay out what the Fielder-Oppenheim film is: not a Holmes documentary but a film about how Fielder would make one, set 34 days before she reported to prison. They flag spoilers and the documentary-ethics questions it raises.
    New angle: The film is set about 34 days before Elizabeth Holmes reported to federal prison.
  22. Pablo Torre Finds Out, 2026-10-22 (15:21 to 17:59)
    Rebutts that the film reopens the fraud
    Morris rebuts the idea that the film reopens whether Holmes was a fraud, walking through the government's and SEC's findings - inaccurate patient results, inflated revenue, the Pfizer logos - to argue the case is settled and the film is about media-making instead.
  23. Pablo Torre Finds Out, 2026-10-22 (17:59 to 26:14)
    Close reads the film's opening scene
    Close reading of the film's opening: Billy Evans on the phone, the cut revealing Holmes with a child, and Nathan Fielder lurking in the background as a voyeuristic signal. It stays inside the film's strategies and the 34-day countdown already on the record.
  24. Pablo Torre Finds Out, 2026-10-22 (26:29 to 30:39)
    Reads two scenes as tonal shifts
    Walks through two scenes: Fielder explaining the Who's on First routine to a Holmes who doesn't get the joke, and the cut to Billy Evans showering. Reads both as tonal shifts that make Fielder an adversarial presence in the house. Scene analysis, not new reporting.
  25. Pablo Torre Finds Out, 2026-10-22 (30:39 to 35:59)
    Debates whether the film is love or strategy
    Debates whether the film is a love story or a strategy, reading the Who's on First scene as a relationship and a sandwich of two men around Holmes. Adds one detail from the film: an offhand comment that Fielder was going through a breakup during filming.
    New angle: An offhand comment in the film says Nathan Fielder was going through a breakup during filming.
  26. Law&Crime Sidebar, 2026-10-29 (19:54 to 21:16)
    Explains prison phone rules via the call scene
    Walks through the film's phone-call scene, where Billy Evans warns Fielder not to record a call with Holmes, and uses it to explain prison phone rules: three-way calls to unapproved people can land an inmate in segregation, while a recording she did not know about likely would not.
  27. Law&Crime Sidebar, 2026-10-29 (25:03 to 26:58)
    Argues Holmes calculated the documentary deal
    Paperny, a prison consultant, argues Holmes knew Billy Evans was seeking a percentage of the documentary deal and calls the arrangement calculating. He also puts a figure on her restitution and predicts a media career over Theranos 2.0.
    New angle: Paperny says Holmes's restitution is $452 million and that Evans sought a percentage of the documentary deal.
Unpacking...