Clancy holdout juror doxxed
True crime · Heat 1.0 / 10 · 2 shows · 43m airtime
On September 14, 2026, NBC 10 aired a report with blurred case documents that viewers could decipher, leading to the Clancy holdout juror being doxxed. His name surfaced online with a dropped domestic violence charge and an accusation of squatting; he was not convicted of any crime. Reporting since has established that the juror had an active restraining order against him during deliberations, that the jury list in the Lindsay Clancy case is impounded, and that a willful misrepresentation or omission on a juror declaration carries a fine of up to $2,000. The discussion has moved from the doxxing itself to what jury vetting missed.
How 2 podcasts covered it
- Crime Stories with Nancy Grace, 2026-09-14 (22:04 to 25:41)
Reports the doxxing after blurred documents
Reports that the Clancy holdout juror was doxxed after NBC 10 aired blurred documents that could be deciphered, surfacing a dropped domestic violence charge and a squatting accusation; Grace and Conlin criticize the doxxing.
New angle: The holdout juror's name was released after NBC 10 aired blurred documents that were decipherable. - Crime Stories with Nancy Grace, 2026-09-14 (29:49 to 31:07)
Defends the holdout's right to dissent
Marie Pereira defends the holdout juror's right to stick to his values and calls the leak of his private information wrong, noting the dismissed domestic violence complaint should have been sealed. Reaction and argument, staying inside the doxxing story already on the record. - Crime Stories with Nancy Grace, 2026-09-14 (32:36 to 33:58)
Questions the holdout's jury vetting
Picks up the doxxing thread and turns to jury selection: the holdout was never asked about domestic violence accusations, and in Massachusetts a convicted criminal can sit at the court's discretion. Grace's own bank-robber-juror anecdote frames the gap. - Crime Stories with Nancy Grace, 2026-09-19 (21:53 to 31:29)
Recaps the doxxing of the holdout juror
Recaps the doxxing of the Clancy holdout juror after NBC 10's insufficient blurring, the dropped domestic violence charge, and the 8-2-2 vote. It stays inside the details already on the record. - Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski, 2026-10-03 (13:28 to 17:58)
Questions how the public identified the juror
Turns to the online allegations about the holdout juror's past and the voir dire question. A retired Massachusetts judge's copy of the standard questionnaire is walked through, and the segment notes the juror list is impounded, so how the public identified him is unknown.
New angle: The jury list in the Lindsay Clancy case is impounded. - Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski, 2026-10-03 (19:38 to 23:40)
Reads the questionnaire and finds the restraining order
Reads the jury questionnaire's experience-with-the-law list line by line and finds the holdout juror had an active restraining order against him during deliberations, which the form's served-with-a-court-order box would have captured.
New angle: The holdout juror had an active restraining order against him during deliberations. - Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski, 2026-10-03 (23:40 to 41:59)
Walks through the juror declaration rules
Walks through the juror declaration itself: a dismissed domestic violence charge does not disqualify a juror in Massachusetts, but a willful misrepresentation or omission on the form is a crime carrying a fine of up to $2,000, and the questionnaire is destroyed once the juror is excused.
New angle: A willful misrepresentation or omission on the juror declaration is a crime punishable by a fine of up to $2,000.